Spectral data in geological mapping

Multiscale hyperspectral analysis of lithologies in the Arctic

Regional geological mapping in northern regions is time consuming and costly, primarily owing to poor accessibility and a short field season caused by snow cover. Along with established geophysical exploration technologies (e.g. magnetic and radiometric surveys), hyperspectral imaging can facilitate detailed continuous regional mapping in the arctic and subarctic owing to low vegetative cover, although issues such as low illumination and pervasive rock encrusting lichens remain a challenge. Our focus is thus integration of spatial and spectral information for lithological identification and mineral mapping from different scale (satellite-based, airborne, ship-based, drone-based, terrestrial). We apply and develop automatic methodologies and investigate their efficiency in dealing with challenges that may rise in arctic areas, such as lichens, low sun angle, shadows, snow and ice, etc.

Hyperspectral Analysis of Lithologies in Presence of Abundant Lichens

Airborne hyperspectral (HyMap) data was chosen to investigate the potential of hyperspectral sensors for detailed lithological mapping in central West Greenland (Innarsuaq), where an ultramafic rock unit is exposed with the presence of lichen coatings (Figure 1).

coordinate specifications of examined area on a map of Greenland

Figure 1. Central West Greenland (Innarsuaq), where ultramafic rock units are exposed b) Coverage of the airborne hyperspectral data is marked by red frame, c) the CIR color composition of HyMap data, highlighting abundant vegetation coverage, (Salehi et al. 2017a)

Spatial–spectral endmember extraction (SSEE) method (Rogge et al. 2012; Rogge et al. 2007) is used for the selection of optimal endmembers and assessment of subtle lithological variability across the given study area. The amphibole minerals as exemplified by the hornblende, actinolite and anthophyllite in Figure 2 dictate the SWIR spectral characteristics of ultramafic rocks. The absorption features in the SWIR region are at 2.32 and 2.38 μm, respectively, and both features are of the same order of magnitude. The SWIR spectrum of the olivine rich rocks clearly reflects the mixture of antigorite, serpentine with the characteristic stronger absorption feature at 2.32 μm. A less distinct absorption feature at 2.31 μm is present for rocks enriched in talc.

Graph
Figure 2. Spectra of extracted endmembers compared with selected minerals from USGS spectral library. a) full spectral range b) SWIR range, (Salehi et al. 2017a)
Index values specified on graphical map
Figure 3. Result of spectral unmixing for the main geologic endmembers in presence of abundant lichen and vegetation generated with the ISMA method, purple color outlining mafic-ultramafic supracrustal rocks, (Salehi et al. 2017a).

Fractional abundances of the endmembers within the scene are determined using an iterative implementation of spectral mixture analysis (ISMA) (Rogge et al. 2006). The result is a set of abundance fractions for the optimal endmembers (Figure 3). Analysis of the airborne data resulted in a high quality regional mapping product capable of discriminating geological materials of interest based on subtle spectral differences and resulting fractional abundance maps allow subsequent detailed geologic interpretation. (Figure 3).

Modeling and assessment of wavelength displacements of characteristic absorption features of common rock forming minerals encrusted by lichens

Lichens are the dominant autotrophs of polar and subpolar ecosystems commonly encrust the rock outcrops. Spectral mixing of lichens and bare rock can shift diagnostic spectral features of materials of interest thus leading to misinterpretation and false positives if mapping is done based on perfect spectral matching methodologies. The extent to which diagnostic rock features are preserved, despite the presence of lichens, is of major concern in remotely sensed geological studies and estimates of the critical level of lichen coverage, below which spectral features of the mineral substrate can still be identified, are needed. We investigated how surficial lichen cover affects the characteristics of shortwave infrared (SWIR) mineral absorption features and the efficacy of automated absorption feature extraction. Distinctive trends were identified that can be used in future analysis (Salehi et al. 2017b). By quantifying lichen cover effects on mineral absorption features, our study highlights the importance of being precautious in any interpretation in areas characterized by abundant lichen-covered outcrops. This can be of significant importance for mineral- and deposit vectoring as the presence of abundant lichen coverage causing slightly shifted features for a given spectra can be erroneously identified as a path to a deposit.

Identification of a robust lichen index for the deconvolution of lichen and rock mixtures

The ability to distinguish the lichen coverage from rock and decomposing a mixed pixel into a collection of pure reflectance spectra, can improve the applicability of hyperspectral methods for mineral exploration. The objective of this study is to propose a robust lichen index that can be used to estimate lichen coverage, regardless of the mineral composition of the underlying rocks. Laboratory spectroscopic data are obtained from lichen covered samples collected from Karrat, Liverpool Land, and Sisimiut regions in Greenland (Figure 4). The spectra are then resampled to Hyperspectral Mapper (HyMAP) resolution, in order to further investigate the functionality of the indices for the airborne platform. In both resolutions, a Pattern Search (PS) algorithm is used to identify the optimal band wavelengths and bandwidths for the lichen index. The results of our band optimization procedure revealed that the ratio between R894-1246 and R1110 (Figure 5) explains most of the variability in the hyperspectral data at the original laboratory resolution (R2=0.769). However, the normalized index incorporating R1106-1121 and R904-1251 yields the best results for the HyMAP resolution (R2=0.765).

Map
Figure 4.Geology map of Greenland and the locations of the collected rock samples. a) Karrat region: quartzite [3 samples], b) Liverpool Land region: monzonite [3 samples], c) Sisimiut Kangerlussuaq region: kimberlite [9 samples], lamproite [4 samples], gneiss [3 samples], kersantite [3 samples], fenite [3 samples], granite [5 samples], carbonatite [4 samples], (Salehi et al. 2017b)
graph
Figure 5. Schematic representation of the averaging concept used for index calculations, (Salehi et al. 2016)
  • Rogge, D.M., Bachmann, M., Rivard, B., & Feng, J. (2012). Spatial Sub-Sampling Using Local Endmembers for Adapting OSP and SSEE for Large-Scale Hyperspectral Surveys. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 5, 183-195
  • Rogge, D.M., Rivard, B., Zhang, J., & Feng, J. (2006). Iterative Spectral Unmixing for Optimizing Per-Pixel Endmember Sets. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44, 3725-3736
  • Rogge, D.M., Rivard, B., Zhang, J., Sanchez, A., Harris, J., & Feng, J. (2007). Integration of spatial–spectral information for the improved extraction of endmembers. Remote Sensing of Environment, 110, 287-303
  • Salehi, S., Jakob, S., Gloaguen, R., & Fensholt, R. (2017a). Multiscale Hyperspectral Analysis of Lithologies in Presence of Abundant Lichens and Mapping of Ultramafic Rocks in Western Greenland (Innarsuaq). In, 10th EARSeL SIG Imaging Spectroscopy Workshop
  • Salehi, S., Karami, M., & Fensholt, R. (2016). Identification of a robust lichen index for the deconvolution of lichen and rock mixtures using pattern search algorithm (case study: Greenland). Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLI-B7, 973-979
  • Salehi, S., Rogge, D., Rivard, B., Heincke, B.H., & Fensholt, R. (2017b). Modeling and assessment of wavelength displacements of characteristic absorption features of common rock forming minerals encrusted by lichens. Remote Sensing of Environment, 199, 78-92

Sara Salehi

Researcher
Petrology and Economic Geology
Phone: +45 91333856